#Amd Phenom Ii X4 810 Upgrade Candidates The

L1 Cache Sizes: 64K of L1 instruction and 64K of L1 data cache per core (512KB total L1 per processor) L2 Cache Sizes: 512KB of L2 data. Comparative analysis of Intel Celeron J1850 and AMD Phenom II X4 810 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.AMD Phenom II Processor Model X4 810 / X3 720 Black Edition. Intel Celeron J1850 vs AMD Phenom II X4 810. Our top overclock on stock VCore with the X4 810 resulted in a 3.12GHz clock speed at a healthy 240HTT clock and Northbridge speed at 2400MHz.

It’s generally a win-win scenario. Companies can get away with selling slightly slower processors, and users get to feel like they’re pulling one over on the man by getting more than they’d originally thought. Overclocking lets companies put out a product rated for a certain speed and leave it up to the end user to take a chance for some extra power. While it’s often possible to achieve some pretty hardcore overclocking feats on locked processors, have the multiplier available to play around with tends to make things much, much easier.

They also require new memory. Due to the major structural changes on Intel’s side, such as moving the memory controller on-die, the newest processors can’t be used in any prior board. Our review unit went up to 3.8 GHz on air and remained fairly stable while it could go higher, not many benchmarks could finish.One major difference between AMD’s and Intel’s most recent CPU efforts is the issue of backwards compatibility. It’s recently come out that they’ve been shipping their least expensive next generation CPU, the $279.99 Core i7 920, with an unlocked multiplier.

When flashing the BIOS of the previous motherboard, however, something went wrong, resulting in one of our AM2+ ASUS boards being completely bricked. Originally, we’d planned to double up on the benchmarks, testing the new processor in the backwards-compatible AM2 board as well as the newer AM3 board complete with DDR3 RAM. Users may end up with a busted processor for their troubles, especially considering that the newer CPUs have two fewer pins on the bottom than their predecessors.Our test system featured the AMD Phenom II X4 955 BE CPU, 4GB of Corsair DDR3 RAM, an ASUS M4A79T Deluxe motherboard, an OCZ Vertex 30 SSD as its main drive and, somewhat ironically, an EVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 graphics card. It’s worth noting at this point that while the new AM3 processors are backwards compatible with AM2+ motherboards, those AM2 chips are not forward-compatible with AM3 sockets. The PII X4 955 is no exception, and can be put in many older motherboards, needing only a BIOS update.Once they’ve bought the processor, users can buy a new AM3 motherboard and DDR3 RAM at a later time, hopefully taking advantage of a lower price tag. This way, users looking for a little extra oomph can drop in a new CPU and not necessarily be forced to buy an entire new system.

AMD has been suggesting that the $245 PII 955 compares favorably to the $270 Core 2 Quad Q9550. Granted, the 920 can itself be overclocked. With a little overclocking effort, the PII 955 even starts to nip at the heels of Intel’s Core i7 920, which is a pretty respectable feat. Testing seemed to bear this out, with most results offering a noticeable, but not outstanding, increase in performance.WPrime benchmark comparison results (lower numbers mean better performance) CPUThe results aren’t too surprising there’s a noticeable performance increase, though this no doubt owes more to the higher clock speeds than any particular difference in chip design. Regardless, press materials included by AMD suggest that the new Dragon update, with the X4 955 CPU and HD4890 video card offers around a 10% performance boost over the last high-end combo, which used the X4 940 CPU.

Still, the processor traded blows with the 940 and basically came out tied.AMD has been offering their unique OverDrive software now, and have released version 3.0 in beta form for testing and review. The test itself is multicore aware, but it works by processing one file per core at a time, and occasionally there will be an orphan process left over after the other three cores have finished, which makes the completion time a little lopsided. Granted, these are started to show their age, but it’s worthwhile to for comparison’s sake.Audio Compression Test (lower scores mean better performance) CPUThe audio compression test takes about an hour’s worth of music in uncompressed WAV format and uses the LAME codec to compress it to 14 320k MP3 files.

Ideally, even manufacturers will get in on the action, posting new profiles with their software for maximum performance on AMD platforms.In the past, OverDrive has been a useful utility to overclock a processor in order to run a few benchmarks, though for permanent benchmarking, it doesn’t seem to fare as strongly as setting it directly in the BIOS. The settings are all stored in plaintext XML files, giving consumers the ability to easily set up new profiles without a bunch of button clicks, as well as trade them amongst themselves. AMD took the profiles idea one step further, too, giving users the ability to change settings based on specific programs or games. When combined with certain motherboards and high-end memory, OverDrive can automatically detect and set not only the CPU settings but also memory clocks and timing. Instead of playing around in the BIOS and constantly rebooting, users can pull a few sliders around and change clock speeds, multipliers and even voltage of certain components.What’s new in this beta over previous editions of the overclocking suite is AMD’s addition of so-called B.E.M.P., or Black Edition Memory Profiles.

Amd Phenom Ii X4 810 Upgrade Candidates The

Combined with their very competitive graphics segment, however, AMD continues to present a very reasonable option to Intel and NVIDIA.Come back later this week for our review of ATI’s HD4890, the remaining leg of the updated Dragon platform. It’s a risky game considering the weak financials they’ve been forced to confront lately. AMD is fleshing out its latest CPU map and rebuilding a brand that can compete with Intel on price, if not on power. Those who’d been holding off to see what else AMD had up their sleeves are likely to be better upgrade candidates the jump in performance will be a lot more noticeable.Granted, there weren’t any major architecture changes, so this release was never going to be more than evolutionary, but that’s not such a bad thing. Users who have already upgraded to a Phenom II 940 and/or an HD4870 probably won’t see a good return on their money for an upgrade. Users running the Windows 7 betas might do well to steer clear of OD’s impending 3.0 release, since it was very buggy on our 64-bit install.While AMD’s new Dragon platform is definitely more powerful and capable than before, the leap in performance isn’t huge.